Services

What Apogee provides: licensing and registration, spectrum and bandwidth planning, interference and sharing analysis, orbital debris compliance, policy and rulemaking support, and diligence. Each engagement ends in a written deliverable.

Each service below lists its scope, inputs, deliverable, and timeline. Work is quoted in writing and starts once the scope is signed and a mutual NDA is in place. Apogee also does technical work for the regulators themselves: frequency allocation, sharing studies, and licensing frameworks for the FCC, NTIA, the ITU, and NOAA.

Licensing and registration strategy

Operators preparing a space station or earth station application under part 100 (formerly part 25), a modification, a US market access petition for a foreign-licensed system, an SCS authorization, or ITU filings through the FCC; start-ups working out what their first filing needs.

What you get

An application roadmap listing every technical showing the filing needs and its status, a milestone and bond calendar under the part 100 rules (formerly 47 CFR 25.164 and 25.165), the ITU filing plan, and a filing-ready technical narrative for counsel.

TimelineTwo to three weeks from documents received. Reviewed in a working session, with the written roadmap two days later.

What to have ready

Mission architecture, frequency plan, existing filings and their status, coordination agreements, business plan, and the milestones already running.

Request this service

Spectrum and bandwidth allocation

Operators deciding which bands to request and how to divide them: bandwidth per beam, polarization and color reuse, capacity per satellite, and the sharing rules each band brings with it.

What you get

An allocation plan with capacity and interference numbers for each candidate band, the coordination each band will require, and a position on the bands opened by the Spectrum Abundance proceeding.

TimelineTwo to three weeks.

What to have ready

Service requirements, candidate bands under 47 CFR 25.202 and the Table of Allocations, antenna and payload parameters, and the constellation geometry.

Request this service

Interference and sharing analysis

Operators that need a technical showing the FCC, the ITU, or a coordination counterpart will accept: PFD and EPFD, the performance-based GSO protection criteria under FCC 26-26, NGSO/NGSO inter-round criteria, ESIM, or SCS out-of-band emissions.

What you get

An analysis memo written for the record with reproducible models, the sensitivity of the result to the assumptions, and support in the coordination meetings that follow.

TimelineTwo to four weeks per showing.

What to have ready

Beam patterns, power and EIRP masks, constellation geometry, the counterpart system's parameters where available, and the rule or agreement the showing has to satisfy.

Request this service

Orbital debris and disposal compliance

Operators preparing the orbital debris showing under part 100 (formerly 47 CFR 25.114(d)(14) and 25.283): five-year post-mission disposal, collision risk, casualty risk, and disposal reliability.

What you get

Decay and disposal analysis across the solar cycle, the reliability argument for the disposal method, casualty expectation, and the narrative and tables for the showing.

TimelineTwo weeks.

What to have ready

Spacecraft mass and area, propulsion and disposal method, operational altitude, reliability data, and the mission timeline.

Request this service

Policy and rulemaking

Operators, investors, and trade groups with a stake in an open proceeding, and the regulatory bodies that need independent technical analysis: Spectrum Abundance, GSO/NGSO sharing, SCS and direct-to-device, orbital debris, or the WRC-27 agenda.

What you get

Comments and reply comments with technical exhibits, ex parte summaries, WRC-27 positioning, and monthly docket monitoring with upcoming deadlines.

TimelineRetainer month to month after the first three, or fixed fee for a single filing.

What to have ready

The docket record, the client's position, and the technical facts that support it.

Request this service

Diligence and on-site support

Investors and acquirers evaluating a satellite operator, and operators that want Apogee to attend coordination meetings, hearings, agency visits, or a board meeting.

What you get

A diligence memo on what the authorizations are worth, what the milestones require, and where the interference and disposal risks are; on site, preparation before the meeting, attendance, and a written debrief within two days.

TimelineOne to three weeks for diligence. On-site work scheduled around the client's date; day rate plus travel at cost.

What to have ready

Authorizations, filings, milestone status, spectrum rights and leases, coordination agreements, and the technical showings behind them.

Request this service

Development programs

Tools Apogee is building from the models it already uses in engagements. Each is available for sponsored development, an SBIR or STTR partnership, or licensing.

Orbit, link, and spectrum analysis software used in Apogee engagements

Dual-framework coexistence analysis

Runs an NGSO system against both regimes that now apply to it: the performance-based GSO protection criteria the FCC adopted in April 2026, and the ITU Article 22 EPFD limits that still govern market access abroad. The output shows, band by band and beam by beam, where a design has margin under one framework and not the other, and which assumptions drive the result.

Why nowSince July 13, 2026 a US-licensed system has to satisfy both frameworks, and today the two analyses are run separately.
Who it is forNGSO operators filing for market access abroad, the agencies evaluating those filings, and coordination counterparts.
StatusInterference, link, and rain models published on the Tools page. Full implementation in development.

Federal reallocation decision support

Coexistence and relocation-feasibility analysis for the federal bands under study: which incumbent systems occupy the band, which interference cases apply, what exclusion zones or sharing conditions would be required, and what relocation would cost and take. The output is the record behind an identification decision, not a single number.

Why nowP.L. 119-21 requires NTIA to identify 200 MHz of federal spectrum by July 2027 and 500 MHz by July 2029. The candidates are 2.7 GHz, 4.4 GHz, and 7.125-7.4 GHz.
Who it is forNTIA and the federal incumbents, the FCC, and the carriers preparing for the auctions that follow.
StatusBand-by-band record published on the pipeline board. Analysis models in development.

Licensing compliance tracking

Tracks what an authorization requires against what has been done: part 100 milestones and bond obligations (formerly 47 CFR 25.164 and 25.165), the ITU Resolution 35 milestones running in parallel, the orbital debris showing, and filing readiness against the current rule text, with the docket activity that could change any of them.

Why nowMissing a milestone without an extension reduces an authorization to the satellites launched. The tracking is manual in most organizations.
Who it is forOperators, the counsel who file for them, and investors holding a position in a licensed system.
StatusRule set and milestone calendar in use in engagements. Product in development.

To sponsor or co-develop any of these, contact Apogee. STTR work requires a research institution partner; Apogee collaborates with universities and a federally funded laboratory.

Start a conversation

Describe the situation and the deadline.

Contact